Trust No Program
This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.
Resuming support for 64-bit Sandboxie
tzuk


Joined: 22 Jun 2004
Posts: 15150
Reply with quote
I have reconsidered my position and decided that I should stop fighting windmills.

I've held out so far because it was important for me to try to get a particular
message out. I appreciate those of you who chose to listen, but realistically,
I have to admit that the world at large does not care much for my message.

So I give up, and thus, without further ado:

http://www.sandboxie.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?t=6842

Supported 64-bit Windows operating systems:
o Windows Vista with Service Pack 1 or later
o Windows 7.

The post below discusses some related technical details.


Last edited by tzuk on Tue Jan 05, 2010 9:08 pm; edited 3 times in total

_________________
tzuk
View user's profileSend private message
tzuk


Joined: 22 Jun 2004
Posts: 15150
Reply with quote
This edition of Sandboxie uses official kernel interfaces, so it does not conflict with the Kernel Patch Protection built into 64-bit versions of Windows.

File-system, registry access and cross-process manipulation in the 64-bit version is subject to strong protection which is provided by kernel mode code, just like the 32-bit version.

However, as described in the WindowsVista64 page, the 64-bit version of Sandboxie cannot use kernel mode supervision to guarantee that software in the sandbox does not connect to a service outside the sandbox. Such connections are protected only at the application level.

For this reason, the Drop Rights option is enabled by default in the 64-bit version of Sandboxie.
View user's profileSend private message
wraithdu


Joined: 29 Jun 2007
Posts: 1410
Reply with quote
Wow, big reversal of opinion there tzuk! I can't say I'm not happy however. My desktop is 64-bit, and I'm considering a new laptop which may also be 64-bit. So Sandboxie support (limited as it may be) is awesome.
View user's profileSend private message
wraithdu


Joined: 29 Jun 2007
Posts: 1410
Reply with quote
This brings up a question now also. How well does SB64 handle WoW64? I'm assuming it properly translates 'Program Files' and 'Program Files (x86)' and the proper registry branches?
View user's profileSend private message
tzuk


Joined: 22 Jun 2004
Posts: 15150
Reply with quote
I think everything should work as you expect. Of course if you notice any problems, I'll try to fix them.
View user's profileSend private message
ssj100


Joined: 23 Apr 2009
Posts: 843
Reply with quote
Wow, a most interesting decision there Tzuk! I know at least one person who will be glad to hear of 64-bit support for Sandboxie.

Tzuk, I have one question, since I think you have implied it in this thread with having Drop Rights enabled by default - will using Sandboxie in a Limited User Account with a 64-bit system prevent the vulnerabilities that you're concerned about? In other words, will using Sandboxie + LUA on a 64-bit system be the equivalent to using Sandboxie + LUA on a 32-bit system with regards to security?

_________________
Sandboxie + LUA + SRP + DEP + SuRun
Windows Firewall + NAT Router + IPSec (on-demand)
VirtualBox (on-demand)
Drive SnapShot (on-demand)
View user's profileSend private message
Mature


Joined: 10 Jun 2009
Posts: 66
Location: china
Reply with quote
haha...what makes you do this which you said you won't do?

anyway,it's still good news though seems the sandboxie 64-bit edition can only be used as a software that keep the pc clean Laughing
View user's profileSend private messageMSN MessengerICQ Number
tzuk


Joined: 22 Jun 2004
Posts: 15150
Reply with quote
ssj100: Best to leave the Drop Rights option enabled, unless you trust the stuff that you're installing into the sandbox.

Mature: I thought I explained what made me change my mind. I tried to bring attention to problems with kernel patch protection, maybe make a change. But most people don't care, and change is not coming. So what's the point?
View user's profileSend private message
Murderlove


Joined: 18 Jul 2008
Posts: 4
Reply with quote
Dear tzuk,

Thank you, thank you and thank you. Reading this has really made my day.
View user's profileSend private message
Mature


Joined: 10 Jun 2009
Posts: 66
Location: china
Reply with quote
tzuk wrote:
ssj100: Best to leave the Drop Rights option enabled, unless you trust the stuff that you're installing into the sandbox.

Mature: I thought I explained what made me change my mind. I tried to bring attention to problems with kernel patch protection, maybe make a change. But most people don't care, and change is not coming. So what's the point?


i think lots of users of sandboxie like me really appreciate the spirit of you having been responsible all the time,maybe having a little rest would help you to lay down the burden Very Happy
View user's profileSend private messageMSN MessengerICQ Number
arran


Joined: 17 Aug 2008
Posts: 60
Reply with quote
In a nut shell it seems sandboxie 64 bit like Mature says is really only good for keeping your pc clean and preventing infection from happening in the first place.

In other words no more putting sandboxie thru the grinder and testing its containment with running malware, you can only install and run trusted programs.

with regards to windows Kernel Patch Protection is there no possible way this can be disabled?

also SSJ why haven't we seen you on wilders lately?
View user's profileSend private message
Julian


Joined: 09 Aug 2009
Posts: 174
Reply with quote
tzuk wrote:

However, as described in the WindowsVista64 page, the 64-bit version of Sandboxie cannot use kernel mode supervision to guarantee that software in the sandbox does not connect to a service outside the sandbox. Such connections are protected only at the application level.

For this reason, the Drop Rights option is enabled by default in the 64-bit version of Sandboxie.

Hello tzuk,
thanks for the x64 version.

Can you please explain what do you mean with programmes in the sandbox to be able to connect to services outside of the sandbox?
Does that mean that (when drop my rights is not enabled) sandboxed programms are able to control services outside of the sandbox?

Thanks. Maybe I'll buy Sandboxie now. Smile
View user's profileSend private message
wraithdu


Joined: 29 Jun 2007
Posts: 1410
Reply with quote
Perhaps read the LINK and it might answer your questions.... just a thought. I mean, it's probably there for a reason, right? You even quoted it...
View user's profileSend private message
Mike


Joined: 16 Nov 2009
Posts: 592
Reply with quote
Wow and wow. Thanks tzuk, this is a huge relief since I had grudgingly decided to move back to 64-bit Windows 7. While a less-than-perfect Sandboxie may be distasteful in theory, in practice it's a carefully considered sacrifice I'm willing to make. I need the extra RAM. (For untrusted software, I run another instance of Sandboxie inside a virtual machine anyway.)
View user's profileSend private message
RSecure
Guest

Reply with quote
Sounds good, but why settle for less tzuk? try and contact MS to support kernel interfaces you need, maybe try teaming up with Ilya in order to get the big companies to listen...
How about branding the x64 vers. with another name till it guarantees equal protection to 32 bit?
How about disabling patchguard on a pc you have, then design a perfect sandboxie for 64. provide a link to a website that guides users how to disable KPG before installing sbie
Resuming support for 64-bit Sandboxie
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
All times are GMT  
Page 1 of 9  

Use the RSS feed to watch this topic for replies
  
  
 This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.  

Sandboxie is Copyright © 2004-2012 by Sandboxie Holdings LLC.  All rights reserved.
Sandboxie.com | Contact Author
This site has been viewed 212,811,559 times since June 2004